I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
В ночь на 22 февраля Военно-воздушные силы (ВВС) Пакистана нанесли авиаудар по афганским приграничным провинциям Пактия и Нангархар. Затем шесть провинций Афганистана оказались центром вооруженного столкновения армий двух государств.
，更多细节参见爱思助手下载最新版本
the computer said. You can think of the Cash Issuing Terminal as, well, just
Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org🇵🇹